case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Little fees use.

If the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and continue according on the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only carried out When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were nicely conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, These are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

Generally speaking, higher courts never have direct oversight over the reduce courts of record, in that they cannot get to out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of your reduce courts.

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced experienced in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children inside the home. The boy was placed in an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted all over within the foster care system.

When you find an error during the information of the published opinion (like a misspelled name or even a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW

The DCFS social worker in charge on the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report towards the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that here she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.

The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation within the police, and so they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its many pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are needed to protect and never abduct. Read more

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include all notable cases decided through the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but can be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.